<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is privacy and why is it important?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/</link>
	<description>digital humanities, web 2.0, eResearch...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: craigbellamy.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data</title>
		<link>http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>craigbellamy.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>[...] Along with balancing the rules that govern Intellectual Property, the battles over the protection of personal data become another area of potential conflict within a society where information storage and retrieval devices have become cheap and ubiquitous. Here is the international guidelines set by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). Also see the primer that I wrote earlier this year about privacy and why it is important. The development of automatic data processing, which enables vast quantities of data to be transmitted within seconds across national frontiers, and indeed across continents, has made it necessary to consider privacy protection in relation to personal data. Privacy protection laws have been introduced, or will be introduced shortly, in approximately one half of OECD Member countries (Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden and the United States have passed legislation. Belgium, Iceland, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland have prepared draft bills) to prevent what are considered to be violations of fundamental human rights, such as the unlawful storage of personal data, the storage of inaccurate personal data, or the abuse or unauthorised disclosure of such data.OnOn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Along with balancing the rules that govern Intellectual Property, the battles over the protection of personal data become another area of potential conflict within a society where information storage and retrieval devices have become cheap and ubiquitous. Here is the international guidelines set by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). Also see the primer that I wrote earlier this year about privacy and why it is important. The development of automatic data processing, which enables vast quantities of data to be transmitted within seconds across national frontiers, and indeed across continents, has made it necessary to consider privacy protection in relation to personal data. Privacy protection laws have been introduced, or will be introduced shortly, in approximately one half of OECD Member countries (Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden and the United States have passed legislation. Belgium, Iceland, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland have prepared draft bills) to prevent what are considered to be violations of fundamental human rights, such as the unlawful storage of personal data, the storage of inaccurate personal data, or the abuse or unauthorised disclosure of such data.OnOn [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anti Internal Memos Steganography</title>
		<link>http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anti Internal Memos Steganography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not typically a very paranoid person, I&#8217;m just really good at knowing when and where Big Brother is waiting around the corner. One day I finally had enough information to test my theory. Someone sent me a copy of one of the memos that was send out to one of the larger groups. It detailed the transition of a very important vice president to &#8220;special projects&#8221;. For those of you not accustom to the corporate world, that is double talk for the professional equivalant of the round file. So it was exactly the kind of dirt that these types of website and indeed investors would want to know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m not typically a very paranoid person, I&#8217;m just really good at knowing when and where Big Brother is waiting around the corner. One day I finally had enough information to test my theory. Someone sent me a copy of one of the memos that was send out to one of the larger groups. It detailed the transition of a very important vice president to &#8220;special projects&#8221;. For those of you not accustom to the corporate world, that is double talk for the professional equivalant of the round file. So it was exactly the kind of dirt that these types of website and indeed investors would want to know. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ha.ckers.org security lab - Archive &#187; Anti Internal Memos Steganography</title>
		<link>http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>ha.ckers.org security lab - Archive &#187; Anti Internal Memos Steganography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>[...] While I was working for my last enterprise company I got this sneaking suspicion that something was going on with our corporate email. In particular, I thought that someone was embedding information into the emails to be tracked at a later date. This was in an attempt to stop employees from sending corporate confidential emails to third parties without concent - particularly fuckedcompany.com (the owner of which now runs Adbright, as an aside) and internalmemos.com, among others. I&#8217;m not typically a very paranoid person, I&#8217;m just really good at knowing when and where Big Brother is waiting around the corner. One day I finally had enough information to test my theory. Someone sent me a copy of one of the memos that was send out to one of the larger groups. It detailed the transition of a very important vice president to &#8220;special projects&#8221;. For those of you not accustom to the corporate world, that is double talk for the professional equivalant of the round file. So it was exactly the kind of dirt that these types of website and indeed investors would want to know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While I was working for my last enterprise company I got this sneaking suspicion that something was going on with our corporate email. In particular, I thought that someone was embedding information into the emails to be tracked at a later date. This was in an attempt to stop employees from sending corporate confidential emails to third parties without concent - particularly fuckedcompany.com (the owner of which now runs Adbright, as an aside) and internalmemos.com, among others. I&#8217;m not typically a very paranoid person, I&#8217;m just really good at knowing when and where Big Brother is waiting around the corner. One day I finally had enough information to test my theory. Someone sent me a copy of one of the memos that was send out to one of the larger groups. It detailed the transition of a very important vice president to &#8220;special projects&#8221;. For those of you not accustom to the corporate world, that is double talk for the professional equivalant of the round file. So it was exactly the kind of dirt that these types of website and indeed investors would want to know. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigbellamy.net &#187; Not so smart card</title>
		<link>http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>craigbellamy.net &#187; Not so smart card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craigbellamy.net/2006/04/24/privacy/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] Hopefully, public awareness will rise in Australian about the negative aspects of the so-called &#8217;smart-card&#8217; (ie Privacy concerns). This is a similar proposal to the Australia Card in the 1980s, however because of the advences in technolgy (ie. data mining, and data matching) the stakes are a lot higher. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hopefully, public awareness will rise in Australian about the negative aspects of the so-called &#8217;smart-card&#8217; (ie Privacy concerns). This is a similar proposal to the Australia Card in the 1980s, however because of the advences in technolgy (ie. data mining, and data matching) the stakes are a lot higher. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
