What is Digital Humanities (and why we are saying such terrible things about it)

(This is a Facebook comment I made in response to Federico Meschini’s response to Matthew Kirschenbaum talk at Loyola University (of the same title).  I will try and find a copy of the lecture and get back to you).

Ideas exist in political economies. And interdisciplinary relationships exist in political economies. Even though I am a historian very much on the ‘new media’ side of the spectrum (not in an academic job), I have nothing but respect for humanists who have taken much more risky paths in their career (and may or may not have been rewarded by it).

By risky I mean academic pursuits that are extraordinarily important, but may be marginal to the mainstream vocational marketplace (ie classics). There are lots of jobs in computing, and not many in humanities and I suspect that the rise of ‘Digital Humanities’ in the US has something to do with this. It is scholars hedging their bets in a scary market place for humanities graduates.

The great danger of the Digital Humanities is that it will be hijacked by market led passivity.

The Digital Humanities have been extraordinary successful in the more canonical and established institutions in the west, but what if less-academically powerful institutions are forced to take different paths? (and universities are powerful in different ways and in different social contexts).

In my own city there are at least 3 massive universities that produce armies of technologist but employ hardy any humanities scholars? There is a inherent danger that I won’t make explicit for the fear of being lined up and shot.

I see two fronts opening up in the DH.

1) there is our traditional task of applying computing technology to humanities tasks. Not necessarily in a  modernist way, but in a traditional scholarly way.

2) There is the new task of making sure that the DH ‘band wagon’ doesn’t become so large that our voices get drowned out by modernist impulses.

uglymodern

Post to Twitter

This entry was posted in digital humanities. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Towards and ‘inconvenient’ Digital Humanities on December 17, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    [...] layer to that text. And the Digital Humanities isn’t Benthamite, utilitarian, nor modernist. These idea are usually associated with industry and government water utilities. The Digital [...]

  2. By The Web and Building | GoatRock Research on March 11, 2011 at 5:13 am

    [...] in DH revolves around a con­tin­u­ing effort to define what the dig­i­tal human­i­ties is or are. One aspect of this almost per­pet­ual debate that seems to crop up con­sis­tently is [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • ...this blog is obsessively directed at profiling digital humanities developments in a cultural, social, and technical sense and in terms of books and applications...it is an aggregation or 'meta' style blog with the occasional commentary

    Hi, my name is Dr Craig Bellamy and I am a digital humanities analyst for the Victorian eResearch Strategic Initiative, a consortium based at the University of Melbourne, however, the views expressed in this blog are the responsibility of the author alone.

    Subscribe

    Follow me on Twitter

  • Pages

  • Categories

  • Archives