Paper
I liked you paper and I wish that I had have heard you presenting it. I especially like the idea of embedding your arguments of masculinity and patriarchy within the culture in which we live. All too often the Gibsonesque drones look for an escape in that barren soul-less place called ‘cyberspace’. I saw one of those awful bubble cars the other day–you know, the sort that Bikers used to piss on at the Broadford rallys–and it had the word”Cyber” blazoned along it’s side. Now there is Cyberspace. Surely there is more room in a HR Manaro?
I’m not sure if I’m a big fan of Fukuyama either. There is a great book by an Australian named Keith Windshuttle The Killing of History: How a Discipline is being Murdered by Literary Theory and Cultural Critics. The past and history are two different things. The past is just there, but history is something that allot of dedicated people spend years scraping through dusty archives to support an argument or empower some group, be they conservative, liberals, or lefties. The thing that makes History different than all other disciplines is that it requires the weight of evidence to support the seeking of truths. The history department at Melb Uni is ironically called “The Department of History and Women’s Studies”. History is the solution, not the problem. It is the lack of History that is the problem. A lack of History means that all these young boof-head Kennett clones get around thinking they are hip when really they look like Duran Duran or Culture Club or some other 80s relic. Now this is tragic. No one owns the past as no one owns history. History is political and this is why Henry Reynolds helped win the Mabo case. It is the lack if History that makes us patriarchal or capitalist or whatever. Now I remember a country where rabid right-wing red-necks had to read a few books before they took public positions….such a long time ago.
His-story
Permalink Dead Email